Obama Want's Higher Taxes And Right's For Usama Bin Laden
Two events made Condoleezza Rice switch from being a registered Democrat to a Republican.
The first was when she watched the 1984 Democratic National Convention that nominated Walter Mondale for president. Rice, who grew up during segregation, was turned off by an endless refrain of appeals to “women, minorities, and the poor, which basically means helpless people and the poor,” she has said. Rice decided she would “rather be ignored than patronized.”
The second event was Jimmy Carter’s professed shock at the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, demonstrating naivete and spotlighting his feeble approach to national security. The spectacle sickened her.
Substitute the name Barack Obama for Walter Mondale and Jimmy Carter and you have a good summation of this presidential candidate’s approach.
To be sure, Obama is a master at seeming to appeal to all sides. But his voting record makes it clear he is a doctrinaire liberal who sees minorities as victims and the government as the solution to all problems — except when it comes to protecting us from terrorist attacks.
According to the National Taxpayers Union, Obama has proposed at least $287 billion a year in new government spending. He also co-sponsored a Senate bill to spend at least $845 billion a year to fight global poverty.
Obama would pay for these increases with much higher taxes, including by allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire in 2010.
Americans for Tax Reform gives him a lifetime rating of 7.5, compared with 82.7 for John McCain. Indeed, the National Journal has ranked Obama the most liberal senator for 2007.
“He’s a bleeding heart liberal, but he’s smart enough not to put it in people's face right now,” says Republican Illinois State Sen. Bill Brady, who worked with Obama in the Illinois State Senate and calls him that body’s most liberal member.
When speaking out against tax cuts, Obama has likened the Ownership Society, which includes such measures as personal Social Security accounts, health savings accounts, incentives to expand home ownership, and tax cuts to encourage growth of small businesses, to “social Darwinism.”
Speaking to the National Women’s Law Center in November 2005, Obama said, “The idea here is to give everyone one big refund on their government — divvy it up into some tax breaks, hand them out, and encourage everyone to use their share to go buy their own healthcare, their own retirement plan, their own unemployment insurance, education, and so forth.”
In Washington, he said, “They call this the Ownership Society. But in our past, there has been another term for it — social Darwinism, every man and woman for him or herself.”
In other words, instead of helping people to help themselves and grow the economy at the same time, Obama’s approach would keep them dependent on government handouts, encouraging them to think of themselves as victims. When it comes to keeping America strong against terrorist threats, it’s quite a different story.
Like a 6-year-old kid who wants to be friends with everyone on the block, Obama has said he would offer prompt negotiations with anti-American despots. More frightening, Obama voted last August to give Osama bin Laden and other terrorists the same rights as Americans when it comes to intercepting their overseas calls in order to pick up clues needed to stop another attack.
Obama recently avoided voting on extending the Protect America Act, thus putting America at risk when immediate interception of terrorist communications is required.
Obama would withdraw immediately from Iraq, leaving that country to morph into a haven for al-Qaida and a staging ground for attacks on America.
While Obama has portrayed himself as a candidate for all Americans, his closeness to his minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, tells a different story. For more than two decades, Wright has been Obama’s friend and sounding board, a man he consults before making important decisions like whether to run for president.
In December, Wright praised Louis Farrakhan as a man who epitomizes greatness. Farrakhan has blamed blacks’ troubles on Jews, America, and whites, whom he calls “blue-eyed devils.”
Obama’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago espouses what it calls the Black Value System. While the Black Value System encourages commitment to God, education, and self-discipline, it refers to “our racist competitive society” and includes the disavowal of the pursuit of “middle-classness” and a pledge of allegiance to “all black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System.”
The Black Value System defines “middle-classness” as a way for American society to “snare” blacks rather than “killing them off directly” or “placing them in concentration camps,” just as the country structures “an economic environment that induces captive youth to fill the jails and prisons.”
Contrary to Obama’s portrayal of himself as a unifier, on every bipartisan effort in the Senate to forge compromises on tough issues, Obama has been missing in action.
In sum, Barack Obama’s voting record, the comments of his close friend and sounding board, and his own statements suggest that the dazzling orator from Illinois represents everything that Condoleezza Rice rejected about the Democratic Party.
If Obama is his party’s nominee, we will all applaud the symbolism of a black man achieving so much. But if they are aware of his radical agenda, it’s doubtful most Americans will buy entrusting the country’s future to him.
Faced with a press that adores Obama, the question will be whether Republicans can portray the stark difference between the man and the myth.
Story Here
IRS Investigates Obama's Church
He Whose Full Name Shall Not Be Spoken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
See! This is where Obama and I part way's. Why are we having to pay for "Global Poverty" if Obama becomes President? There he goes right off the bat he will raise taxes to pay for Some other countries poverty (Not our own mind you) when we already send more food and medicine to EVERY Country around the world as it is!
Why in the hell would Osama Bin Laden get ANY FRIGGEN RIGHT'S AT ALL????
This man is dangerous, will destroy our Military, bargain with our enemies, and is going to get us all killed!!
The first was when she watched the 1984 Democratic National Convention that nominated Walter Mondale for president. Rice, who grew up during segregation, was turned off by an endless refrain of appeals to “women, minorities, and the poor, which basically means helpless people and the poor,” she has said. Rice decided she would “rather be ignored than patronized.”
The second event was Jimmy Carter’s professed shock at the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, demonstrating naivete and spotlighting his feeble approach to national security. The spectacle sickened her.
Substitute the name Barack Obama for Walter Mondale and Jimmy Carter and you have a good summation of this presidential candidate’s approach.
To be sure, Obama is a master at seeming to appeal to all sides. But his voting record makes it clear he is a doctrinaire liberal who sees minorities as victims and the government as the solution to all problems — except when it comes to protecting us from terrorist attacks.
According to the National Taxpayers Union, Obama has proposed at least $287 billion a year in new government spending. He also co-sponsored a Senate bill to spend at least $845 billion a year to fight global poverty.
Obama would pay for these increases with much higher taxes, including by allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire in 2010.
Americans for Tax Reform gives him a lifetime rating of 7.5, compared with 82.7 for John McCain. Indeed, the National Journal has ranked Obama the most liberal senator for 2007.
“He’s a bleeding heart liberal, but he’s smart enough not to put it in people's face right now,” says Republican Illinois State Sen. Bill Brady, who worked with Obama in the Illinois State Senate and calls him that body’s most liberal member.
When speaking out against tax cuts, Obama has likened the Ownership Society, which includes such measures as personal Social Security accounts, health savings accounts, incentives to expand home ownership, and tax cuts to encourage growth of small businesses, to “social Darwinism.”
Speaking to the National Women’s Law Center in November 2005, Obama said, “The idea here is to give everyone one big refund on their government — divvy it up into some tax breaks, hand them out, and encourage everyone to use their share to go buy their own healthcare, their own retirement plan, their own unemployment insurance, education, and so forth.”
In Washington, he said, “They call this the Ownership Society. But in our past, there has been another term for it — social Darwinism, every man and woman for him or herself.”
In other words, instead of helping people to help themselves and grow the economy at the same time, Obama’s approach would keep them dependent on government handouts, encouraging them to think of themselves as victims. When it comes to keeping America strong against terrorist threats, it’s quite a different story.
Like a 6-year-old kid who wants to be friends with everyone on the block, Obama has said he would offer prompt negotiations with anti-American despots. More frightening, Obama voted last August to give Osama bin Laden and other terrorists the same rights as Americans when it comes to intercepting their overseas calls in order to pick up clues needed to stop another attack.
Obama recently avoided voting on extending the Protect America Act, thus putting America at risk when immediate interception of terrorist communications is required.
Obama would withdraw immediately from Iraq, leaving that country to morph into a haven for al-Qaida and a staging ground for attacks on America.
While Obama has portrayed himself as a candidate for all Americans, his closeness to his minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, tells a different story. For more than two decades, Wright has been Obama’s friend and sounding board, a man he consults before making important decisions like whether to run for president.
In December, Wright praised Louis Farrakhan as a man who epitomizes greatness. Farrakhan has blamed blacks’ troubles on Jews, America, and whites, whom he calls “blue-eyed devils.”
Obama’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago espouses what it calls the Black Value System. While the Black Value System encourages commitment to God, education, and self-discipline, it refers to “our racist competitive society” and includes the disavowal of the pursuit of “middle-classness” and a pledge of allegiance to “all black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System.”
The Black Value System defines “middle-classness” as a way for American society to “snare” blacks rather than “killing them off directly” or “placing them in concentration camps,” just as the country structures “an economic environment that induces captive youth to fill the jails and prisons.”
Contrary to Obama’s portrayal of himself as a unifier, on every bipartisan effort in the Senate to forge compromises on tough issues, Obama has been missing in action.
In sum, Barack Obama’s voting record, the comments of his close friend and sounding board, and his own statements suggest that the dazzling orator from Illinois represents everything that Condoleezza Rice rejected about the Democratic Party.
If Obama is his party’s nominee, we will all applaud the symbolism of a black man achieving so much. But if they are aware of his radical agenda, it’s doubtful most Americans will buy entrusting the country’s future to him.
Faced with a press that adores Obama, the question will be whether Republicans can portray the stark difference between the man and the myth.
Story Here
IRS Investigates Obama's Church
He Whose Full Name Shall Not Be Spoken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
See! This is where Obama and I part way's. Why are we having to pay for "Global Poverty" if Obama becomes President? There he goes right off the bat he will raise taxes to pay for Some other countries poverty (Not our own mind you) when we already send more food and medicine to EVERY Country around the world as it is!
Why in the hell would Osama Bin Laden get ANY FRIGGEN RIGHT'S AT ALL????
This man is dangerous, will destroy our Military, bargain with our enemies, and is going to get us all killed!!
Labels: Obama
posted by Marie's Two Cents | 10:59 AM
30 Comments:
This comment has been removed by the author.
I agree, Obama is dangerous. However, I'm going to go against conventional wisdom here and predict that he will lose. I don't think America will like his liberal message.
Danny,
Hopefully after we enighten Americans about what is really at stake here.
It looks like Hillary is just about toast and this Love affair with Obama it's time to come to an end and let's get down to business.
Barack said that he has no problem with his middle name.He said that he is proud of his mame, so we should use it all the time now. Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
DD,
LOL
First his campaign get's pissed about the Picture of Obama In "Dress" then they are having a hissy fit that his middle name is being used.
You know it upset's Barack HUSSEIN Obama, but what other choice does he have, he has to say it does'nt bother him lol.
So we are free to use it!
Goodie! Like I was'nt going to anyway LMAO!
Obama is against nuclear war?
What a coward!
He's against unnecessary spending?
Idiot!
He won't put weapons in space.
Pfft! Jesus would. What? Do you think you're better than Jesus?
Can someone post the link where he is for talking to Osama Bin Laden. I can't find it.
And...
Real quick, this is an easy one. Will someone point out to me that part in the Bill of Rights where it states that those particular Constitutional rights apply only to U.S. citizens? Thanks much. I'll be checking back to see who is the quickest to post that information!
BTW...McCain was born in Panama. He must be a member of MS13.
Yet, October 2, 2007, in a Foreign policy speech
( http://www.cfr.org/publication/14356/ ) Obama said -
"We will not pursue unilateral disarmament. As long as nuclear weapons exist, we'll retain a strong nuclear deterrent. But we'll keep our commitment under the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty on the long road towards eliminating nuclear weapons. We'll work with Russia to take U.S. and Russian ballistic missiles off hair-trigger alert, and to dramatically reduce the stockpiles of our nuclear weapons and material. We'll start by seeking a global ban on the production of fissile material for weapons. And we'll set a goal to expand the U.S.-Russian ban on intermediate-range missiles so that the agreement is global."
So which is it, retain nukes or get rid of them?
Federalist,
He won't put weapons in space.
Pfft! Jesus would. What? Do you think you're better than Jesus?
If you recall our Navy just shot down a Sattelite that was falling towards earth. Not just America, EARTH! If we dont have that capability, what is going to happen the next time something like that goes on?
Or how about President Akmenutjob? What if he decides to go ballistic and lob a few missles our direction? We should'nt have the capability to protect ourselves and shoot the damn things down before they hit us? Or should we just let them hit us and us not be able to access Montana or Arizona for the next 50 years?
Can someone post the link where he is for talking to Osama Bin Laden. I can't find it.
LOL! That's a new one, I had'nt heard that one before. Um....Is he?
Real quick, this is an easy one. Will someone point out to me that part in the Bill of Rights where it states that those particular Constitutional rights apply only to U.S. citizens? Thanks much. I'll be checking back to see who is the quickest to post that information!
BTW...McCain was born in Panama. He must be a member of MS13.
What are you talking about? What only applies to U.S. Citizens?
And McCain was born on a U.S. Military installation in Panama to American parent's that were stationed there.
If you know anything about the Military you should know that U.S. Military Installations in other Countries ARE U.S. Soil.
But you lost me anyway, I dont know who you are talking to or who brought up Citizenship?
Indigo,
"We will not pursue unilateral disarmament. As long as nuclear weapons exist, we'll retain a strong nuclear deterrent. But we'll keep our commitment under the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty on the long road towards eliminating nuclear weapons. We'll work with Russia to take U.S. and Russian ballistic missiles off hair-trigger alert, and to dramatically reduce the stockpiles of our nuclear weapons and material. We'll start by seeking a global ban on the production of fissile material for weapons. And we'll set a goal to expand the U.S.-Russian ban on intermediate-range missiles so that the agreement is global."
So which is it, retain nukes or get rid of them?
Good question.
So while every one else pretends they are disarming, and we do, we are unprotected against those who have been hiding them.
Absolutely Brilliant!
And they say you dont need experience to be President Pfft!
Marie, Barack Hussein Obama is a socialist weenie. What else is there to say? His ideas of being militarly weak is his most dangerous aspect. Then his ideal of taxing beyond our means is an old idea that has failed in every place it's been tried. The definition of Insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
Socialist health care is failing in all the places that it is now in place, over taxing and over regulating businesses is driving them all to manufacture in China because they have no regulations other than you must show up to work and accept what what we pay you.
Baloney warming is another socialist idea to gain control of the government and people's lives in ways that communism failed to do. All these things are Barck Hussein Obama. The sheeple come and faint at his show, it's kind of sad though. To think that people can be fooled so easily. It's like Bill Clinton saying we did everything we could to get Ubama er Usama, whatever or Saddam Hussein was never a threat. He never used chemical weapons on his own people and he bought them from Ronald Reagan. All untruths but Obamians believe every word of it. I can't wait to hear his next proclamation from on high
I'm so glad you posted that video, Marie, and great job on this post! I wish FoxNews would publish this video. People truly need to see and hear from Obama's own mouth exactly who he really is.
Jenn,
I know Obama is a total Liberal and all but I still have a million questions.
And you know what? This Love affair America seems to have with Obama it's time it comes to an end and let's get to the issues!
All this swooning over him is making me sick. Girls screaming and carrying on as if they saw the Beatles in the '60's or something.
And then all the sudden using his middle name is "Taboo", you cant use his middle name, you cant call him a Liberal, I mean why is he being protected like this?
Just because he is a person of color big deal!
It's like Elizabeth Edwards being off limits because she has cancer but yet she can say anything she want's and she is suppose to be untouchable?
Obama is just starting to drive me crazy that's all.
He has'nt much experience and will still probably become President because Hillary is about toast, and some people (I'm not talking about you) are going to either stay home on election day or vote for Ronald McDonald before they will McCain, which to me is crazy.
I mean why not just hand the Presidency over to Obama NOW!
Let's just call this election over.
Nevermind me, I'm just venting and ranting lol
Gayle,
You are welcome :-)
This is only the beginning of what people are going to find out about this man grrrr
This Love Fest has to come to an end somehow.
A bit of regulation in China may have helped avert this scandal:
Blood Thinner Might Be Tied to More Deaths
By WALT BOGDANICH
Published: February 29, 2008
Amid indications that more people may have died or been harmed after being given a brand of the blood thinner heparin, federal drug regulators said Thursday that they had found “potential deficiencies” at a Chinese plant that supplied much of the active ingredient for the drug.
The Changzhou SPL plant, which is west of Shanghai, supplied much of the active ingredient for the blood thinner heparin.
Baxter International, which makes the brand of heparin associated with the problems, and buys supplies from the Chinese plant, announced that it was expanding a recall to include virtually all its heparin products. to meet the demand.
[skip]
[O]ne of the consolidators received supplies from small, unregulated family workshops that scraped mucous membrane from pig intestines and cooked it, eventually producing a dry substance known as crude heparin.
The F.D.A. admitted this month that it had violated its own policy by failing to inspect SPL, located west of Shanghai, before the factory began shipping the heparin ingredient to Baxter in 2004. China’s drug agency also did not inspect the plant.
Last week, the F.D.A. sent inspectors to the plant. Among the potential problems they found was a failure to properly follow the steps for identifying impurities and deficiencies related to manufacturing equipment. According to a redacted inspection report released by the agency, the SPL plant appeared to have made at least some heparin with “material from an unacceptable workshop vendor.” The vendor was not identified.
The glories of a deregulated economy.
So what if it kills a few Americans here and there. Children? Beh. If you're gonna take medicine, it's up to you to know if the outsourcing the American big Pharma uses is legit and not into cutting corners for profits. And if you or your kids die as a result of this, well tough.
Long live deregulation.
It's a profit-driven world out there. Let's hope the medicines all you are taking aren't contaminated and will lead to your untimely deaths.
Joanne,
This may come as a surprise to you but I'm a tad ticked at the USDA myself.
I think they may be understaffed which is so not good.
It has made me mad as hell about this beef recall, they will NEVER be able to find where all the meat product's went to.
I feel your frustration!
It was really a pleaure reading you blog Marie.
At last some one with some sense.
Thank you fro some good reading. I hope to visit you here again.
Red State Rob,
Thank You :-)
Stop by anytime
The Federalist actually thinks the fact that McCain was born in Panama on a military post is going to go anywhere? ROTFALMBO! You're absolutely right, Marie. McCain was born in the United States because he was born on one of our military bases which is United States soil, so sorry, Federalist. Your showing your complete ignorance with that pitiful charge!
Gayle,
I wasn't calling into question his citizenship. Although...it appears he was not born on a military base! Wouldn't that be something? If he was DQ'd because of Constitutional law? Holy Irony! Bush & Co. have spent 7 years destroying it and now it would come back to bite them.
My reference to McCain being born in Panama was from Marie's assertion that Obama was born in Somalia(?) Or is it another African country Marie? I can't keep track as the right continually changes and flip-flops...and spins.
Obama spent 4 years in Indonesia at a secular school. Guess that makes him a terrorist...
Marie,
I had referenced the Bill of Rights in an earlier post because your OP was screaming as to why anyone BUT U.S. citizens would be protected by the Constitution. My response was simple. The Bill of Rights does not apply ONLY to U.S. Citizens. In fact, it doesn't even apply to ANY citizens. It applies to what the GOVERNMENT can and cannot do to ANY HUMAN CITIZEN.
As the NIE report concluded(and dozens and hundreds of other experts with FACTS), Iran is not developing nuclear weapons and even if they wanted to, they wouldn't even have a weapon that could reach Turkey in at least 15 years.
But hey, these facts don't help the war effort so...phooey. Forget all this. Let's get us some more of dat shock and awe! YEEEHAAWW!
By the way...what was Bush's experience again, prior to the 2000 election? Governor? And...
Federalist,
Oh no you dont,
I wasn't calling into question his citizenship. Although...it appears he was not born on a military base! Wouldn't that be something? If he was DQ'd because of Constitutional law? Holy Irony! Bush & Co. have spent 7 years destroying it and now it would come back to bite them.
My reference to McCain being born in Panama was from Marie's assertion that Obama was born in Somalia(?) Or is it another African country Marie? I can't keep track as the right continually changes and flip-flops...and spins.
Oh Good God!
Bush and co have spent 7 years destroying what exactly? I know you are not talking about the Military because it was broken when Bush entered office and he has been fixing it ever since. But then that's what happens when a Democrat has been in office for any length of time, we have to fix what they screw up.
And yes McCain was born on a U.S. Military Instalation in Panama which is U.S. Soil dufuss. His father was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone and his mother was a nurse there.
I NEVER said Obama was born in Somalia, see if you would actually read what I say you would have a better understanding of what's really going on.
I said Obama was dressed in "Traditional Somali Dress", The Picture I put up on that post even says it. I Never once said Obama was born in Somalia, he would'nt even be able to run for President if he was. How the hell did you get "Traditional Somali Dress" and he being born there crossed and screwed up is beyond me. Do you drink? lol
Talk about flip flops and spins lol, by the way I'm wearing my Kerry Flip Flops right now, my other thongs broke and I thought I cant get a dime for these things on ebay so I'm wearing them now until I get my ass all the way to the store to buy a new pair :-)
Marie,
I had referenced the Bill of Rights in an earlier post because your OP was screaming as to why anyone BUT U.S. citizens would be protected by the Constitution. My response was simple. The Bill of Rights does not apply ONLY to U.S. Citizens. In fact, it doesn't even apply to ANY citizens. It applies to what the GOVERNMENT can and cannot do to ANY HUMAN CITIZEN.
This I do not recall, I dont remember saying anything about whoever being protected by the Constitution. You must visit other blogs besides mine and they must be giving you more hell than I have lol.
As the NIE report concluded(and dozens and hundreds of other experts with FACTS), Iran is not developing nuclear weapons and even if they wanted to, they wouldn't even have a weapon that could reach Turkey in at least 15 years.
Um....OK tell that to Akmenutjob! He claims he will be able to strike Israel by June, and the US by next year. But hey, I should'nt believe anything coming straight from the horses mouth right? I should pay more attention to weapons inspectors he has thrown out of the Country (Just like Saddam did) and these reports are just that, reports. If we are to believe someone elses intelligence of course, considering they came back with worse news about Saddam, yeah the same group of weapons inspectors. Not to mention all the other inspectors from all the other countries involved as well.
I guess Russia just want's to see Iran with Nuclear power which I never knew Centrifuses and enriched Uranium were a part of for power but hey what do I know? Oh yeah not to mention Akmenutjob has said he want's to wipe Israel and the US off the face of the earth but he's just high right? BTW, who mentioned Turkey? Is Iran now pissed off at Turkey too?
But hey, these facts don't help the war effort so...phooey. Forget all this. Let's get us some more of dat shock and awe! YEEEHAAWW!
By the way...what was Bush's experience again, prior to the 2000election? Governor? And...
I have'nt seen you come up with any actual facts as of yet. You talk about fact's but have no proof of any!
And dont YEEHAWWWW me you little Varment!
Bush's experience hmmm, well he had Governed a State Before, and he had to clean up after the biggest accomplishment of the Clinton administration which of course was attacking Waco, Texas.
It seems Bush has had to clean up after the Clintons/Democrats long before he ever entered office.
Oh not to mention with Clinton not taking out Bin Laden when he had the chance, what was it 7 times he had the chance and didnt take the shot? (Of Course he was to busy with Cigars and stuff) Bush had to clean up after all that too. And has been ever since.
Oh and that darn piece of paper called "The Iraq Liberation Act" that Clinton signed into law in 1998 calling for regime change in Iraq that Bush enforced.
No I guess Bush didnt have that much experience as a war time President until 9-11.
But he had alot of experience cleaning up after Democrats!!
Which of course took a whole administration to do, and it still isnt finished!
Marie,
You said that Obama was dressed in "native" dress. "Native" is defined as "being such by birth or origin".
Either willingly or unwillingly you are making that case that Obama is from Somalia.
You then typed, "Why in the hell would Osama Bin Laden get ANY FRIGGEN RIGHT'S AT ALL????"
My reference to the Bill of Rights stems from that comment. Like it or not, terrorists and all other humans on the planet ARE granted certain rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. That is why are democracy is superior to all others on the globe (as long as we reinstate habeas corpus, which will happen when the Bush regime leaves office).
The Bush regime has spent 7 years chipping away at the Constitution, Constitutional law and our civil liberties.
If I knew how to post links I would show you Scott Ritter's piece on how badly Iran struggles with enriching uranium. When Ritter describes their difficulty, it conjures up images of an episode of the 3 Stooges.
You still didn't address Bush's experience prior to 2000. Other than getting C's in college and running businesses in the ground, governor does qualify. But that's it. Or is it like Hillary in that dinner at the White House counts, too?
*"are" = our
Federalist,
Marie,
You said that Obama was dressed in "native" dress. "Native" is defined as "being such by birth or origin".
Either willingly or unwillingly you are making that case that Obama is from Somalia.
Oh for God's sake you are one picky Democrat.
"Naitive as in Origin" Happy Now?
My reference to the Bill of Rights stems from that comment. Like it or not, terrorists and all other humans on the planet ARE granted certain rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. That is why are democracy is superior to all others on the globe (as long as we reinstate habeas corpus, which will happen when the Bush regime leaves office).
We dont Govern all Humans on the Planet therefore the "Bill Of Right's" does NOT apply to anyone outside the United States Of America.
Usama Bin Laden HAS NO RIGHT'S! He has the right to die and that's it! And the sooner the better as far as I'm concerned, but then again had Clinton done away with him we wouldnt be in this mess at all today now would we?
The Bush regime has spent 7 years chipping away at the Constitution, Constitutional law and our civil liberties.
That's a crock of crap and you know it! Bush has followed every letter of the law during wartime. If he didnt, like you on the left would love to portray he would be hanging from a rope in front of the Capitol Building by now.
FISA- Signed into Law by Jimmy Carter in 1978 [Enables US Agencies, FBI, CIA, etc. to surveil telephone communications and access records of calls within the United States that are used between two or more humans to perform acts of terrorism or the communication of two or more humans to conspire to commit a terrorist act.]
Has to be updated now because computers werent around back then.
"The Iraq Liberation Act"- Signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1998
[Calls for regime change in Iraq, declares/labels Saddam Hussein a Terrorist.]
Hell, dont believe me, look it up!
Bush isnt stupid, he knows all of this and has used it to protect himself while enforcing laws already on the books to go after terrorists and those who harbor them since the attacks of September 11, 2001.
So when you say Bush has been chipping away at the Constitution, it's an absolute falsehood.
If I knew how to post links I would show you Scott Ritter's piece on how badly Iran struggles with enriching uranium. When Ritter describes their difficulty, it conjures up images of an episode of the 3 Stooges.
Good! Maybe it will take them longer to anailate us than originaly thought. But I'm not buying it. I'm also not suggesting we send Troops there either. I am however suggesting if not us, that someone take out thier Nuclear building capabilities with a huge bomb!
You still didn't address Bush's experience prior to 2000. Other than getting C's in college and running businesses in the ground, governor does qualify. But that's it. Or is it like Hillary in that dinner at the White House counts, too?
Yes I did, read it again.
Since Marie will not post George W. Bush's extensive experience PRIOR to becoming dictator, I will.
The argument that Barrack HUSSEIN Obama lacks experience or does not have a platform is ridiculous...especially when you see what Dubya's done:
Past Work Experience
* Ran for congress and lost.
* Produced a Hollywood slasher B movie.
* Bought an oil company, but couldn't find any oil in Texas; company went bankrupt shortly after I sold all my stock.
* Bought the Texas Rangers baseball team in a sweetheart deal that took land using taxpayer money. Biggest move: Traded Sammy Sosa to the Chicago White Sox.
* With father's help (and his name) was elected Governor of Texas.
Accomplishments in Previous Positions
*
Changed pollution laws for power and oil companies and made Texas the most polluted state in the Union.
*
Replaced Los Angeles with Houston as the most smog-ridden city in America. Cut taxes and bankrupted the Texas government to the tune of billions in borrowed money.
*
Set record for most executions by any governor in American history.
*
Became president after losing the popular vote by over 500,000 votes (first and only time this has ever happened in U.S presidential election), with the help of my father's appointments to the Supreme Court.
Records and References
* At least one conviction for drunk driving in Maine (Texas driving record has been erased and is not available)
* AWOL from National Guard and deserted the military during a time of war.
* Refuse to take drug test or even answer any questions about drug use.
* All records of my tenure as governor of Texas have been spirited away to my father's library, sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
* All records of any SEC investigations into my insider trading or bankrupt companies are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
* All minutes of meetings for any public corporation I served on the board are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
* Any records or minutes from meetings I (or my VP) attended regarding public energy policy are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public review.
* For personal references please speak to my daddy or uncle James Baker (they can be reached at their offices of the Carlyle Group for war-profiteering.)
Now this is what I call "real" experience that readies someone for office of President, right?
This comment has been removed by the author.
To think that the Constitution guarantees anyone but American citizens rights is simply a ludicrous statement. The Constitution has two parts to it. The first part is the rules of governance for the US Government. The second part of the Constitution is is the Bill of rights designed specifically the limits of the Federal Government in relation to US citizens. There is nothing in the Bill of rights that extends protections to non citizens, absolutely nothing and to make that statement shows a complete ignorance of the the Constitution and it's original intent. What a moron.
Where does it say "applies only to U.S. citizens" in the Bill of Rights?
Obama is Jimmy Jr.
Glad you posted the video up top Marie.
That statement by Obama is frightening. It would leave us weak and vulnerable to every rogue nation around the world.
I'm hopeful that people will get over their warm and fuzzy love affair with Obama long enough to actually LISTEN and THINK about the kind of change he would bring.
I know the Democrats who love Jimmy Jr. won't do that. The Obama Kool Aid they have drunk must taste good, but drink too much and you go blind.
Mike,
Great post! Yeah, I agree. I quit drinking the fear-mongering, terrorist color alert kool-aid years ago. IT almost made me blind.
I do agree though, going after terrorists will leave us vulnerable to other rogue nations, of which there are none, but who cares? There's a threat somewhere damn it!
Instead I'm for bombing and occupying countries that have nothing to do with terrorism.
I got your back on this bro! ;-)
Federalist,
You people are the reason I post the entire story, part of a story or at least the link to a story.
So there will be no confusion and the reseach has already been done for you.
Post a Comment
<< Home