20 Year Clinton Advisor Says: Clinton Attack "Outrageous"/ "The Path to 9/11"
Dick Morris: Clinton Attack 'Outrageous'
The attack by Bill Clinton and his allies on the upcoming ABC miniseries "The Path to 9/11" is "outrageous," charges former Clinton aide Dick Morris.
As NewsMax has reported, Clinton through his surrogates have demanded that ABC "correct all errors" in the docudrama or pull it from the air, charging that it is a "fictitious rewriting of history" regarding Clinton's handling of the terrorist threat.
But Morris claims that Clinton's national security adviser, Sandy Berger, and the president himself "were both responsible for failing to catch or kill Osama bin Laden on several different occasions."
Morris served Clinton as an adviser for 20 years and notably as Clinton's senior campaign strategist during his 1996 re-election.
Morris states that the evidence for this failure is documented in the 9/11 Commission's report and summarized in "Because He Could," the book about Clinton that Morris co-authored with his wife Eileen McGann.
The commission's report, released in the summer of 2004, "highlighted the weak, incompetent, hesitant, and inconsistent attempts of the Clinton administration to kill or capture Osama bin Laden," according to the book, which devotes an entire chapter to Clinton's mishandling of the threat.
"The report's account shows the president and his advisers at their worst."
One time, the United States "canceled an attempt to kidnap bin Laden out of concern that we might injure or kill him and be accused of using assassination as a policy tool," Morris told NewsMax.
"The president had yet to make a finding that it was OK to kill bin Laden. The reason he had not is that he did not yet know bin Laden's connection to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The reason he did not know that is that he did not fast-track the investigation.
"A second time, we did fire missiles but alerted the Pakistani military to our plans and they tipped off bin Laden, and he escaped."
According to the commission's report, the United States alerted Pakistan because the missiles targeting bin Laden, who was in Afghanistan, had to cross Pakistan, and U.S. officials did not want Pakistan to think the missiles came from India.
"A third time, our plans to attack by missile were canceled, partially out of chagrin over having missed him before and partially because we had just bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade by mistake and were worried about being called trigger happy," said Morris.
"The president was also concerned about civilian deaths in any such attack.
"The underlying theme of the ABC coverage, that he was distracted by impeachment, is of course true. But more so, he was gun-shy" because he was afraid conservatives would say he had launched a failed attack "in an effort to 'wag the dog' and distract people from the Monica Lewinsky affair."
Morris concluded: "His fear of such attacks on him inhibited him from acting."
Read Story Here
UPDATE: Senate Democrats Demand ABC Cancel Movie "Path To 9/11" (Well of course they do)
Read Story Here
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh brother, the more this is comming out the more I am really not liking Clinton on this whole thing. And for years the Left Wing Nuts have blamed Bush, when it was Clinton all along! I wonder how far ABC is going to cave to suit Clinton? Does ABC have any guts at all?
The attack by Bill Clinton and his allies on the upcoming ABC miniseries "The Path to 9/11" is "outrageous," charges former Clinton aide Dick Morris.
As NewsMax has reported, Clinton through his surrogates have demanded that ABC "correct all errors" in the docudrama or pull it from the air, charging that it is a "fictitious rewriting of history" regarding Clinton's handling of the terrorist threat.
But Morris claims that Clinton's national security adviser, Sandy Berger, and the president himself "were both responsible for failing to catch or kill Osama bin Laden on several different occasions."
Morris served Clinton as an adviser for 20 years and notably as Clinton's senior campaign strategist during his 1996 re-election.
Morris states that the evidence for this failure is documented in the 9/11 Commission's report and summarized in "Because He Could," the book about Clinton that Morris co-authored with his wife Eileen McGann.
The commission's report, released in the summer of 2004, "highlighted the weak, incompetent, hesitant, and inconsistent attempts of the Clinton administration to kill or capture Osama bin Laden," according to the book, which devotes an entire chapter to Clinton's mishandling of the threat.
"The report's account shows the president and his advisers at their worst."
One time, the United States "canceled an attempt to kidnap bin Laden out of concern that we might injure or kill him and be accused of using assassination as a policy tool," Morris told NewsMax.
"The president had yet to make a finding that it was OK to kill bin Laden. The reason he had not is that he did not yet know bin Laden's connection to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The reason he did not know that is that he did not fast-track the investigation.
"A second time, we did fire missiles but alerted the Pakistani military to our plans and they tipped off bin Laden, and he escaped."
According to the commission's report, the United States alerted Pakistan because the missiles targeting bin Laden, who was in Afghanistan, had to cross Pakistan, and U.S. officials did not want Pakistan to think the missiles came from India.
"A third time, our plans to attack by missile were canceled, partially out of chagrin over having missed him before and partially because we had just bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade by mistake and were worried about being called trigger happy," said Morris.
"The president was also concerned about civilian deaths in any such attack.
"The underlying theme of the ABC coverage, that he was distracted by impeachment, is of course true. But more so, he was gun-shy" because he was afraid conservatives would say he had launched a failed attack "in an effort to 'wag the dog' and distract people from the Monica Lewinsky affair."
Morris concluded: "His fear of such attacks on him inhibited him from acting."
Read Story Here
UPDATE: Senate Democrats Demand ABC Cancel Movie "Path To 9/11" (Well of course they do)
Read Story Here
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh brother, the more this is comming out the more I am really not liking Clinton on this whole thing. And for years the Left Wing Nuts have blamed Bush, when it was Clinton all along! I wonder how far ABC is going to cave to suit Clinton? Does ABC have any guts at all?
posted by Marie's Two Cents | 11:01 PM
24 Comments:
Nah, ABC will cave. They have too much invested in the Clinton legacy. They propped him up at every possible chance. ABC has no stomach for the blistering they will get from the Clintonistas. Don't expect to see the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth from this highly edited lackumentery.
Dick Morris has written a book about Condi vs. Hillary. I haven't read it but Morris as much of snake as he is, knows the odds and is the total insider. Morris is telling everyone to beware of Hillary to everyone that will listen.
Do you remember when Barbara Striesand made the Anti-Reagan Movie a few years back? I don't remember any Dems complaining about historical facts then,and DEMANDING it gets pulled or any Republicans either for that matter. It was the American people who complained,and got it pulled. And another thing that bothers me is that Bush gets beat up because 9-11 happened 8 months after he took office,but the first WTC bombing happened 30 days after Clinton took office,and he did nothing about it for his 8 years. They have their first two term President in decades,and they make him out to be the best President in history. I'm starting to rant now...so I'll leave it at that
Here's another update: From Bush's former Chief of Staff to the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board:
Roger Cressey, former Chief of Staff to the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board at the White House from November 2001 to September 2002, told Scarborough:
SCARBOROUGH: Roger, let me begin with you. There are points of this docudrama that are more drama than fact. But talk about Bill Clinton and the central premise by ABC that he should have done more to get Bin Laden.
CRESSY: Joe, it's amazing, based on what I've seen so far is how much they've gotten wrong. They got the small stuff wrong such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed instructing Ahmed Rassam to carry out the millenium attacks. Then they got the big stuff wrong, this fantasy about how we had a CIA officer and the Northern Alliance leader Ahmed Massoud looking at Bin Laden and they breathlessly call the White House to say we need to take him out and the White House said no. I mean it's sheer fantasy. So, if they want to critique the Clinton administration and the Bush administration, based on fact, I think that's fine. But what ABC has done here is something straight out of Disney and fantasyland. It's factually wrong. And that's shameful.
SCARBOROUGH: But at the same time, doesn't history show that Bill Clinton had several opportunities to go after bin Laden, but the President and his cabinet were afraid to do so because they may offend some people in the Arab world?
CRESSY: Actually, Joe, that had nothing to do with it. If you read the 9/11 Commission report, it makes it very clear. In most of those cases, George Tenet, the Director of the CIA, said because there was single source intelligence it was his recommendation to the President not to take the shot. There was never a case where we had a clear shot at Bin Laden and the decision to take it wasn't made.
I'm sure you'd want to keep this controversy "fair and balanced."
Happy to do my part.
Oh, and angry American, just for the record, the people who are complaining about this fake-u-drama ARE Americans. So the "American people" are complaining.
Please rethink that silly, misinformation at the end of your rant, okay?
On March 4, 1993 authorities announced the capture of one of the suspected bombing conspirators, a Palestinian named Mohammad Salameh. In May 1994 Mohammad Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Mahmud Abouhalima and Ahmad Ajaj were each convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the World Trade Center bombing.
In October 1995, the militant Islamist and blind cleric Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, who preached at mosques in Brooklyn and Jersey City, was sentenced to life imprisonment for masterminding the bombing. Rahman, whose Islamic Group organization is believed to have had links to Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, was later convicted with a number of others of conspiracy charges to bomb several New York City landmarks (see New York City landmark bomb plot). In 1998, Ramzi Yousef, said by some to have been the real mastermind, was convicted of "seditious conspiracy" to bomb the towers.
Actually, you're doing what the guy who's made the fake-u-drama did, MAKING S**T UP!
But I don't blame you for trying to get away with it.
Hey Marie,
This is difficult, I know, but here's another Bush supporter on the fake-u-drama:
Richard Miniter - a conservative author who wrote a book Losing bin Laden: How Bill Clinton’s Failures Unleashed Global Terror - conceded on CNN on September 7, 2006 that several of the complaints about the mini-series being made by Clinton administration officials were entirely justified. And that several scenes in the film were based on "Internet myth."
You have to concede that it is NOT just the liberals who find this fake-u-drama is inaccurate.
And making stuff up in made for tv movies is common. Problem is, Nowresteh uses real people's names, M. Albright, S. Berger, and has them saying made up stuff.
That called libel.
He could have gotten away with this if he had said it was "fictionalized" and made up people's names. You know, a Roman a clef. (That's French, by the way.)
And you do know that the guy who produced the fake-u-drama is, OH. MY. GOD. AN IRANIAN!!!!!!!!
Remember what jg and you said about those "type" of people? THEY'RE OUT TO KILL ALL AMERICANS!!!!
Have it occured to you that Nowrasteh's using this fake-u-mentary to, gulp, annihilate us all?????? He'll get you guys to think he's on your side, then, when you're not looking, BAM!
I don't know about you guys, but I'm crawling under my bed. This Iranian guy scares me.
Jeez this is too easy, I'm bored.
Roger Cressey, former Chief of Staff to the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board at the White House from November 2001 to September 2002, told Scarborough:
Then they got the big stuff wrong, this fantasy about how we had a CIA officer and the Northern Alliance leader Ahmed Massoud looking at Bin Laden and they breathlessly call the White House to say we need to take him out and the White House said no. I mean it's sheer fantasy
Well just how does this guy Cressy know anything about what went on in the Clinton administration if he was the president's advisor from November 2001 to September 2002 and the scene that is supposedly potrayed was back in the 90's? Clinton was out of office by then, so was this Cressy there when the call came in during the Clinton admin or what?
This lackumentry is supposed to be based on the 9/11 commission report anyway. A document that is on par with the Warren commission report. The only thing missing is for Arlen Fencesitter to come up with a stupid and unworkable theory. Fencesitter can tell everyone that the planes were actually single bullets created under Scottish law. ( that's a test to see if you really know what's going on )
Former Clinton admin officals and party hacks supervised the creation of this 9/11 document so the film is as much a fantasy and lie as the document itself.
Just what was Sandy Berger stuffing down his pants and socks anyway. You can bet it wasn't a tuna on rye. How come Jamie Garelic wasn't asked to tesify? Oh yeah, she was one of the Commissioners that was supposed to ask the questions not answer them, sorry. That would have been pretty good though to see Richard Ben Vinetse ask Ms Garelic some of his very tough quetions and make political points just like he did when he defended Slick Willie at his Impeachment.
These people that you reference to make "informed" comments but have no credentials and no credibility you can do better than Mrs. Green I have confidence in you.
The blind Sheikh Rahman was attached to al-Queda through al Zwahiri (the #2 big cheese in al-Queda) They are both Egyptians and cut their teeth in terrorism murdering guys like Sadat and all that. Friendly bunch of guys eh Mrs. Green? Don't bother hiding under your bed, your president is protecting you right now. That might be made much more difficult though if democrats gain control of either house.
Democrats don't think we're at war and that we are the problem but if they win either house then it will be time to hide Mrs Green. The guys wearing the table cloths will be taking aim at the notheast again too it's an easy target because the democrats have been stealing all the money that's supposed to go to protect the citizens up there in there liberalland.
Another update, Marie. Harvey Keitel blasts the ABC fake-u-drama:
Harvey Keitel speaks out on "Showbiz Tonight about the controversy ABC’s "Path to 9/11" has caused and in which he stars.
Video-WMP Video-QT (rough transcript-not full)
Keitel: Yea, I had questions about events–material I was given in the Path to 9/11 that I did raise questions about. Yes, I had some conflicts there.
Q: How was that met?
Keitel: With discussion..ummm with argument. When I received the script it said ABC history project –I took it to be exactly what they presented to me. History–and that facts were correct. It turned out not all the facts were correct and ABC set about trying to heal that problem..In some instances it was too late because we had begun.
Q: Do you feel that anything should be changed in this film?
Keitel: Yes I do. This is a tough issue.–(sure)
You can compile certain things as long as the truth remains the truth. You can’t put things together, compress them and then distort the reality.
Q:…in the case of September 11th though, do you feel that it is an absolute responsibility that it be factually accurate even if it is a dramatization?
Keitel: Absolutely, you cannot cross the line from a conflation of events to a distortion of the event. No. Where we have distorted something we have made a mistake-and that should be corrected. It can be corrected. It can be corrected by the people getting involved in the story that they are going to see.
jg sez:
Well just how does this guy Cressy know anything about what went on in the Clinton administration if he was the president's advisor from November 2001 to September 2002 and the scene that is supposedly potrayed was back in the 90's? Clinton was out of office by then, so was this Cressy there when the call came in during the Clinton admin or what?
A simple google of Cressey's name, and you would have found out that
Roger W. Cressey was a counterterrorism official on the National Security Council under Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
jg sez:
Democrats don't think we're at war and that we are the problem but if they win either house then it will be time to hide Mrs Green. The guys wearing the table cloths will be taking aim at the notheast again too it's an easy target because the democrats have been stealing all the money that's supposed to go to protect the citizens up there in there liberalland.
jg, I'm sorry for you. You really do believe that Americans who do not share your conservative world view would not want to protect their own country in which they and their families live and breath, don't you.
Democrats would invite our enemies to come in and kill them and their families? You really believe that?
And your uninformed statement about Democrats "stealing money" that should go to protect Americans is laughable. Try googling to see which states contribute the most to US government revenues and which contribute the least. The blue states overwhelmingly contribute the most in federal taxes and their hard earned money goes to support the poorer south and southwestern states. That is a fact. What on earth are you talking about?
Homeland Security funds were doubled and tripled in states like Wyoming, and funds were reduced in states like New York, where the terrorist attacks actually took place.
Why would the terrorists want to attack Wyoming? They got something against sheep?
Karl Rove has worked his magic on you.
Ever try critical thinking?
It will free you from your overweening hatred.
Gosh Mrs Green it is tiring to have to spell everything out for you because all you know is what you can google.The reason, ah the heck with this. You are lost am I tired of this game.
It's someone else's turn at this wacko.
Gosh Mrs Green it is tiring to have to spell everything out for you because all you know is what you can google.The reason, ah the heck with this. You are lost am I tired of this game.
It's someone else's turn at this wacko.--jg
When you can't refute the facts, call people names.
Hey! It works in the school yard.
JG,
Nah, ABC will cave. They have too much invested in the Clinton legacy. They propped him up at every possible chance. ABC has no stomach for the blistering they will get from the Clintonistas. Don't expect to see the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth from this highly edited lackumentery.
Dick Morris has written a book about Condi vs. Hillary. I haven't read it but Morris as much of snake as he is, knows the odds and is the total insider. Morris is telling everyone to beware of Hillary to everyone that will listen.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nope not after it is cropped and shopped. By the time ABC is done with it, all the truth will be taken out.
Smell George Soros at work here?
I think I would tend to believe someone with 20 years expierience with the Clinton's who knows what is really going on over all this other drivel.
Especially when on the other post I made there is a link to an Audio tape of Clinton saying in his own voice that he blew his chance to get Bin Laden!
The Angry American,
Do you remember when Barbara Striesand made the Anti-Reagan Movie a few years back? I don't remember any Dems complaining about historical facts then,and DEMANDING it gets pulled or any Republicans either for that matter. It was the American people who complained,and got it pulled. And another thing that bothers me is that Bush gets beat up because 9-11 happened 8 months after he took office,but the first WTC bombing happened 30 days after Clinton took office,and he did nothing about it for his 8 years. They have their first two term President in decades,and they make him out to be the best President in history. I'm starting to rant now...so I'll leave it at that
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I aways have to check now and make sure you are the Real Angry American lol, isnt that awful?
Yes I do remember Streisand and her crap, and I recall Tom Daschle saying about CBS that "Pulling That Movie Is Appauling".
It seems if it fit's the Liberal Agenda it's ok but when someone makes a movie about Clinton, that most clear thinking people know to be true, the swords and the fury come out of the Liberals like I have never seen. And you have Harry Reid writing a letter to ABC for gooness sakes. I didnt see this happen with the Reagan movie.
I personnally would have liked the Reagan movie to have been shown, everyone would have had a chance to make thier own minds up, but the timing was off I think wasnt it real close to when Reagan passed away? I cant remember and I dont feel like looking into it at the moment.
Yep 30 days after Clinton took office up until a few months before he left office, we were attacked here, and other places all over the world.
Most people remember all that.
The American people are not that stupid that they cant see this I'm sure.
Feel Free to rant anytime my friend.
Mrs Green,
Here's another update: From Bush's former Chief of Staff to the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board:
~~~~~~~~~~~
You know Mrs Green just out of curiosity today I went and had a good look at the Huffington Post, and every single thing you have posted on here is from there! Interesting isnt it.
You have NO more credibility with me anymore Mrs Green.
Talk about propaganda.
If I want to read any more of your cut and paste drivel I will just go over to the Huffington Post from now on!
So you can refrain from posting anything from there to here.
However, if you feel the need to post all this drivel, GET YOUR OWN BLOG TO DO IT WITH!
So your propaganda from Newsmax is okay?
Puleeeeeeze.
Okay.
You guys can have fun talking to yourselves and patting youselves on your backs.
But it looks like the ABC fake-u-drama is in big trouble.
Mrs. Green said...But it looks like the ABC fake-u-drama is in big trouble.
The only reason it is in trouble Mrs. Green, if that's who you are, is because people like you refuse to see that we are at war with people that would kill or enslave us. I don't need to cut and paste any one else's ideas or words because I have been an independent thinking person my entire life.
After getting some needed sleep. I did a little research into your fellow Cressy. He was an assistant to Richard Clark on the NSC staff and was not privy to NSC internal documents nor did he attend full NSC meetings. Even so, this so called documentary is only being disputed for two scenes that portray Sandy Berger as an incompetent fool and we already were aware of that. The other dispute is with Madeline Albright and she is supposed in the film to have said something she claims she didn't.
Given the track record of the integrity of those that worked in the Clinton admin, the benefit of the doubt is no longer applicable. These people are convicted felons and the de Schlickmeister has had his license to practice law revoked Sandy Berger is a convicted document thief. What do you suppose was written in those documents that he stole Mrs. Green? Do you think those stolen documents that Sandy Berger was stuffing down his socks and pants contained vital information he did not want the 9/11 commission seeing possibly about that very incident that they are disputing maybe? I’ve asked you that question many times and you and your kind seem awful eager to gloss right over the answer to that question.
Well, all I can say Mrs. Green is make sure the veil on your burqa is properly worn when you go down to see the speech at the National Cathedral, they won't let you in unless you have one or are not escorted by a male family member. Who is escorting you? Enjoy the whine.
Mrs Green,
So your propaganda from Newsmax is okay?
Puleeeeeeze.
Okay.
You guys can have fun talking to yourselves and patting youselves on your backs.
But it looks like the ABC fake-u-drama is in big trouble.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I dont just go with Newsmax stories, if you would actually look at some links on my posts, I get them from ALL Over the place, even the New York Times!
But the Huffington Post? Where every hate monger on the left sets and gets it on with each other?
I thought you had more class than that Mrs Green!
JG,
Given the track record of the integrity of those that worked in the Clinton admin, the benefit of the doubt is no longer applicable. These people are convicted felons and the de Schlickmeister has had his license to practice law revoked Sandy Berger is a convicted document thief. What do you suppose was written in those documents that he stole Mrs. Green? Do you think those stolen documents that Sandy Berger was stuffing down his socks and pants contained vital information he did not want the 9/11 commission seeing possibly about that very incident that they are disputing maybe? I’ve asked you that question many times and you and your kind seem awful eager to gloss right over the answer to that question.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I know I know!!! Raises her hand, Sandy Burglar took National Security documents!!!
Snuck them out in his underwear he did.
Not only did he not want the 9-11 commission to see this crap, but funny thing, the next day after Burglar took this stuff, on his campaign trail while running for President, John Kerry gave a a speach on National Security!
Coincidence? Hmmmm
TERROR DATES
1996
June 25 A lorry bomb explodes at US military barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 19 Americans; Osama bin Laden identified as terrorist financier
1998
June Osama bin Laden placed on FBI’s Ten Most Wanted List
Aug 7 US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania are bombed; Osama bin Laden named as the mastermind of the attacks
Aug 20 US forces launch day of missile strikes on camps in Afghanistan and destroy a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan
Dec 24 In an ABC News interview, bin Laden denies responsibility for the embassy attacks
2000
Oct 12 Attack on the USS Cole by bin Laden sympathisers kills 17
CLINTON
1997
Dec 19 Monica Lewinsky subpoenaed to appear at a deposition hearing
1998
Jan 17 The Drudge Report breaks story about a White House intern’s sexual affair with President Clinton
Jan 26 Clinton declares “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”
Aug 6 Lewinsky testifies before the Starr grand jury
Aug 17 Clinton admits in a televised speech, “I did have a relationship with Ms Lewinsky that was not appropriate”
Dec 11 House Judiciary Committee approve articles of impeachment
Dec 19 Clinton impeached by the House on two counts of perjury and obstruction of justice
1999
Jan 7 Impeachment trial begins in the Senate Feb. 12 Senate acquits Clinton
Marie,
I'm just going to come in here and say "hi", just so you know I stopped by. I cannot believe how much time is wasted arguing with Mrs. Green.
I wonder if she feels she is making any headway? Ha...ha.
Yeah, it is a waste of time to argue with Mrs. Green I suppose. At least Mrs. Green doesn't stoop to using vulgar language like most of the people that agree with the far left point of view.
As Marie has pinpointed; Mrs. Green chooses to cut and paste arguments and comments from a far left and nauseating blog to state her position. This is fairly typical in my experience due to the fact that it takes time and a full thought process to come up with positions of your own.
I went over to that particular far left blog this afternoon to check out what the talking points of the day was today. It is the same old, same old except it appears to have become much more malevolent in nature.
Mr Red,
Thank's for the input lol
Word,
Marie,
I'm just going to come in here and say "hi", just so you know I stopped by. I cannot believe how much time is wasted arguing with Mrs. Green.
I wonder if she feels she is making any headway? Ha...ha.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I know it was such a waste. I dont know if she is comming back or not after I exposed where she is getting ALL of her information!
The Huffington Post P'shaw!!!
She is welcome anytime she wants but I just want her to leave the Huffington Post drivel over at the Huffington Post! If I want total distortion of the facts and utter confusion I can wander over there myself!
Thank's for stopping by Word :-)
JG,
Yeah, it is a waste of time to argue with Mrs. Green I suppose. At least Mrs. Green doesn't stoop to using vulgar language like most of the people that agree with the far left point of view.
As Marie has pinpointed; Mrs. Green chooses to cut and paste arguments and comments from a far left and nauseating blog to state her position. This is fairly typical in my experience due to the fact that it takes time and a full thought process to come up with positions of your own.
I went over to that particular far left blog this afternoon to check out what the talking points of the day was today. It is the same old, same old except it appears to have become much more malevolent in nature.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I went and looked at that Huffington post site and lo and behold there was all that crap Mrs Green was posting, I just had to call her on it.
Your right though at least she didnt swear constantly like some Purple thingy does on here.
Have you looked at the comments on that thing?
I have never seen such a waste of grey matter.
Those people are truly lunatics!
I wish Mrs Green didnt spend so much time over there, her brain is going to melt, and she will soon become just as unhinged as the rest of those people!
Purple,
'those people'? I assume you are referring to the 60+% of the US that disagrees with Bush and the war on Iraq.
You are the minority!
Nice to see a Muslim win the primary in Minnesota huh? though I suppose to you he's of course a terrorist!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Those people? What are you talking about?
Here we go with polls again. Do you really believe them?
I think it's dandy that a Muslim won. Just so long as they did a background check on him, and make sure he isnt trying to infiltrate our Political system.
Oh yeah and check his financial records, and make sure he isnt sending money to Al-Quaida!
Post a Comment
<< Home