Let's See Anyone On The Left Condemn This Piece Of Shit
Film Festival Director Raves About 'Assassinate Bush' Movie
"Xenophobia, the hidden costs of war and the nature of civil liberties in a hyper-media age all come under the microscope" in a controversial movie depicting the fictional assassination of President Bush.
So says Noah Cowan, director of the Toronto Film Festival, where the British-made movie will premier on Sept. 10.
On the festival's website, Cowan describes the movie as "easily the most dangerous and breathtakingly original film I have encountered this year."
He says the director, Gabriel Range, "is interested in addressing today's political issues."
Until now, the movie has been referred to by the Toronto Film Festival as simply "D.O.A.P.," but at a press conference in Britain Thursday, it was announced by the title "Death of a President."
Britain's Channel 4's More4 channel is reportedly hoping to sell the feature-length drama to U.S. networks. After three screenings in Toronto, it will air in Britain on Oct. 9.
At the press conference, More4 head Peter Dale called the film "a pointed political examination of what the war on terror is doing to the American body politic."
Range uses computer-generated imagery, archive footage and special effects in the film, which reportedly depicts a nation polarized by Bush administration foreign and domestic policies -- and features anti-war demonstrations.
The movie is styled as a documentary made several years hence, looking back at the assassination of Bush by an unknown sniper at a Chicago hotel in October 2007 and subsequent events.
Providing a glimpse of the "xenophobia" aspect that Range evidently explores, the synopsis refers to the hunt for the president's killer focusing on an Arab -- a Syrian-born man named Jamal Abu Zikri. The implication is that the suspicion may be misplaced.
News of the movie was circulating on numerous Internet sites and major blogs Thursday.
CBN News reporter Dale Hurd wrote in a commentary that "Death of a President" "should provide haters of Bush on the Left and in the Muslim world with 93 minutes of pure viewing pleasure."
On one movie website, a critic identified as Devin Faraci wrote that although he has not seen other movies directed by Range, "I will say that my interest is piqued. And not just because I hate Bush!"
What if President Bush WAS assassinated? One Writers Opinion - This could really happen!!!
Now For Something Different- Interesting Take On All This
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is to much. I would LOVE to see ANYONE on the Left Condemn this piece of shit!! The Assassination of ANY President is heartbreaking Republican or Democrat alike, but you on the left I bet will just snicker about this. I cant imagine how the Bush family feels about this. Bless thier hearts. If you on the Left dont condemn this I will really know there is NO hope for you anymore.
"Xenophobia, the hidden costs of war and the nature of civil liberties in a hyper-media age all come under the microscope" in a controversial movie depicting the fictional assassination of President Bush.
So says Noah Cowan, director of the Toronto Film Festival, where the British-made movie will premier on Sept. 10.
On the festival's website, Cowan describes the movie as "easily the most dangerous and breathtakingly original film I have encountered this year."
He says the director, Gabriel Range, "is interested in addressing today's political issues."
Until now, the movie has been referred to by the Toronto Film Festival as simply "D.O.A.P.," but at a press conference in Britain Thursday, it was announced by the title "Death of a President."
Britain's Channel 4's More4 channel is reportedly hoping to sell the feature-length drama to U.S. networks. After three screenings in Toronto, it will air in Britain on Oct. 9.
At the press conference, More4 head Peter Dale called the film "a pointed political examination of what the war on terror is doing to the American body politic."
Range uses computer-generated imagery, archive footage and special effects in the film, which reportedly depicts a nation polarized by Bush administration foreign and domestic policies -- and features anti-war demonstrations.
The movie is styled as a documentary made several years hence, looking back at the assassination of Bush by an unknown sniper at a Chicago hotel in October 2007 and subsequent events.
Providing a glimpse of the "xenophobia" aspect that Range evidently explores, the synopsis refers to the hunt for the president's killer focusing on an Arab -- a Syrian-born man named Jamal Abu Zikri. The implication is that the suspicion may be misplaced.
News of the movie was circulating on numerous Internet sites and major blogs Thursday.
CBN News reporter Dale Hurd wrote in a commentary that "Death of a President" "should provide haters of Bush on the Left and in the Muslim world with 93 minutes of pure viewing pleasure."
On one movie website, a critic identified as Devin Faraci wrote that although he has not seen other movies directed by Range, "I will say that my interest is piqued. And not just because I hate Bush!"
What if President Bush WAS assassinated? One Writers Opinion - This could really happen!!!
Now For Something Different- Interesting Take On All This
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is to much. I would LOVE to see ANYONE on the Left Condemn this piece of shit!! The Assassination of ANY President is heartbreaking Republican or Democrat alike, but you on the left I bet will just snicker about this. I cant imagine how the Bush family feels about this. Bless thier hearts. If you on the Left dont condemn this I will really know there is NO hope for you anymore.
posted by Marie's Two Cents | 7:38 AM
35 Comments:
I categorically and unconditionally condemn it!
Just as I am sure you categorically and unconditionally condemned the tapes that Jerry Falwell pushed on his Christian show that accused the Clintons of murder and drug running. And accused Hilary of being a lesbian, while at the same time she was Vince Foster's lover.
And because you were outraged and spoke out about those hideous lies and slander, I am here to say the depiction of an assassination of an American president is not acceptable and will not be supported.
I've got a scathing post brewing about this. I have lived my whole life remembering the assination of JFK and it has affected the way I think about my country. Bill Clinton was nothing but a blip on the radar screen of American history but I would still have been very angry if an outsider had made a movie like this about portraying the assasination of an American President. There will be those at the daily kos and aclu offices that will be down on the front row of the movie's premier but I have and I will always consider people like that unworthy of the distinction of being called "American".
There will be those at the daily kos and aclu offices that will be down on the front row of the movie's premier but I have and I will always consider people like that unworthy of the distinction of being called "American".
Oh, jg, how prescient of you. That statement is based on your raging case of paranoia and victimhood. It makes you feel superior.
But your prediction is nothing but projection.
Get a hold of your hatefulness, will you? It's so unhealthy.
Sheesh!
Also. jg and marie--the people who made this piece of crap aren't even American. Okay? Stop your hysterics.
American liberals can't control what a**holes in other countries do.
Get help.
You can be sure of one thing thing lady, I'm no victim. I call em as I see em. I don't need Mother Jones or any publication to back up my words.You know nothing about military operations yet you insist on trying to find articles that you partially understand to back up riduculous notions conjured up by people that have only appeasement and capitualtion to rely on.
Lady I'm the real deal, I've seen it, I've done. I watched Jimmy Carter attempt to bring us to our knees in front of the Soviets up close and personal. If it weren't for the quick thinking of Reagan we'd still be trying to kiss Breshnev or Gorby's ass with the ridiculous notion of detenté.
I'm part and parcel of the military. I can't serve on the front lines because I'm past the age of reenlistment but I back the men and women up by serving them at home with care and support through the Navy and Marine leagues.
We've been supplying arms to Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Kuwait, and every other two bit nation since Mikhail Kalashnikov invented the AK-47 and his bosses started handing them out bring the third world under the boot of communism. So what, what does that prove, we were the other side of the chess board when the Soviets were in their prime. That's the way it is and that's the way it will always be no matter how hard you wish it to be some way else. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it doesn't, deal with and quit crying about it. It's a moot point.
As far a the left is concerned they hate George Bush and are so blinded by their hate they are going to flock to the Toronto film festival to watch a enactment of their wildest dreams. Just like the Islamic tyrants have their followers bring their children to their schools to show propaganda films showing them how to be homicide bombers to kill the infidel in the name of Allah.
Is inciting more hate by some filmmaker with an axe to grind going to help? Follow the money trail for this shockumentery right back to George Soros the money changer.
I'm going to tell you plain and simple so even you can understand Mrs Green. You had better hope that nothing like that ever does happen to the President because it will become a shooting war in this country with plenty of anarchy, mayhem and violence that will reach even to Hamptons and no amount of hand wrining is going to help.
I'm still waiting for you to answer why you and your ilk won't pitch in and help out instead of sitting on the sidlines throwing stones at the ones trying to protect us from the Islamic tyrants that would enslave or kill us? Maybe you would prefer to be an Isalmic slave instead of having George Bush as president eh? Ever been over to Islamaland? They don't make a burqa in my size, and you?
Mrs Green,
I categorically and unconditionally condemn it!
Just as I am sure you categorically and unconditionally condemned the tapes that Jerry Falwell pushed on his Christian show that accused the Clintons of murder and drug running. And accused Hilary of being a lesbian, while at the same time she was Vince Foster's lover.
And because you were outraged and spoke out about those hideous lies and slander, I am here to say the depiction of an assassination of an American president is not acceptable and will not be supported.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well thank you for condemning this garbage!
I know you on the left think that we on the right are ALL Bible thumpers as most of you put it, but I was unaware or busy at the time to pay any attention to Falwell pushing a tape about the Clinton's being drug runners or that Hillary was a Lesbian, Or Vince Foster's Lover lol!
I dont even pay any attention to Falwell lol, I have no clue what he has been up to.
I truly dont remember that, and yes I condemn it lol.
I cant help but laugh because I dont remember it and when I read that I just started laughing, I must say that you made me have a good laugh lol. And after the day I have had, I needed that.
Why is it you couldnt have just said "Yes I Condemn That"
without trying to change the subject once again?
Oh well I got a good laugh out of it.
JG,
I've got a scathing post brewing about this. I have lived my whole life remembering the assination of JFK and it has affected the way I think about my country. Bill Clinton was nothing but a blip on the radar screen of American history but I would still have been very angry if an outsider had made a movie like this about portraying the assasination of an American President. There will be those at the daily kos and aclu offices that will be down on the front row of the movie's premier but I have and I will always consider people like that unworthy of the distinction of being called "American".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I feel the same way, I was NO fan of Kennedy but him getting assassinated broke my heart.
I felt so bad for the Kennedy family.
Just as it broke my heart when President Reagan got shot. I remember the feeling that I had that another one of our leaders was assassinated, even though he lived thank god, I remember the feeling of NOT KNOWING whether he was going to make it or not. Jesus I will never forget that.
Also I had that feeling when someone tried to crash an airplane into the White House when Clinton was in office.
I was beginning to think that ALL our leaders were under attack constantly and still are.
But this mockumentary takes the cake! And it may give some lunatic out there plenty of ideas, being right here in our own Country or abroad.
I do intend to write every single senator and congressman over the weekend demanding them to condemn this crud.
Mrs Green,
There will be those at the daily kos and aclu offices that will be down on the front row of the movie's premier but I have and I will always consider people like that unworthy of the distinction of being called "American".
Oh, jg, how prescient of you. That statement is based on your raging case of paranoia and victimhood. It makes you feel superior.
But your prediction is nothing but projection.
Get a hold of your hatefulness, will you? It's so unhealthy.
Sheesh!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I havent seen the Daily Kos, The ACLU, or any of them condemn this yet, so I am betting JG's prediction is right!
Paranoia and Victimhood is what we ALL should still have under our belt's knowing we could ALL be attacked again. Remember we have to be correct ALL of the time, the terrorists who want ALL of us dead only have to be right ONCE!
If this movie doesnt bring out the hate in everybody, they arent just stupid, they are pathetic!
I am truly pissed off at this piece of shit of a mockumentary.
Anyone who Loves this Country, no matter who is in office should be also.
Excuse my launguage but I am OUTRAGED AT THIS!!!!
JG,
If I never said this before I will say it now, Thank You for YOUR Service to THIS Country!!!!
jg said:
"Lady I'm the real deal, I've seen it, I've done."
Well that's admirable. Good for you.
But so is John Murtha the real deal who has seen it and done it. And your point is?
jg said:
"As far a the left is concerned they hate George Bush and are so blinded by their hate they are going to flock to the Toronto film festival to watch a enactment of their wildest dreams. Just like the Islamic tyrants have their followers bring their children to their schools to show propaganda films showing them how to be homicide bombers to kill the infidel in the name of Allah."
This is called a straw man argument. A straw man argument is a logical fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw-man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. A straw-man argument is in fact misleading, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.
You do this all the time, jg, because you actually are the one who hates. It is so evident. But you project it onto "liberals."
jg said:
"Is inciting more hate by some filmmaker with an axe to grind going to help? Follow the money trail for this shockumentery right back to George Soros the money changer."
More raging claptrap. Let's see evidence for that slander, jg. So George Soros is "the money changer?" Nice code word, jg. I know what that means--it's a code word for a Jew. Good going Ms. Patriotic Military American. Nice work.
And having served in the military doesn't make you a better American, if you think it does, write a note to Cheney, Rove, Rice, Wolfowitz, Perle and their Operation Iraqi Freedom buddies and tell them how superior you are to them.
Let me repeat. This piece of trash film was made by nonAmericans.
If you, jg, have evidence that George Soros or any American liberal had any part in it, let's see it.
LOL! Every single time I've asked you for evidence to back up your slanderous accusations, you are silent. LOL!!!
You've got a big, big bark, jg, but so far as I can determine, you just make sh*t up.
jg said:
"Maybe you would prefer to be an Isalmic slave instead of having George Bush as president eh?"
Wow! That's my choice? George Bush as president or being an Isalmic [sic] slave?
What's going to happen when George Bush's presidency is over???
Omigod! We're all (you included, jg) going to be enslaved???!!!!!!
You. Are. Not. Thinking. Clearly. Dear. jg.
LOL!
Mrs Green,
jg said:
"Lady I'm the real deal, I've seen it, I've done."
Well that's admirable. Good for you.
But so is John Murtha the real deal who has seen it and done it. And your point is?
jg said:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When a member of the Military comes on MY BLOG, I expect you and anyone else to treat them with the respect they deserve, after all just remember if it wasnt for them you wouldnt be able to post this rediculous drivel repeatedly.
And if Murtha makes an appearance on MY BLOG then he might get treated with respect, but until that time he get's NONE!
Wow!! What a heated set of comments. Anyway, the premise of this film is ridiculous. If someone wanted to assassinate Bush, why wait until OCT 2007..when his term would be almost over.
Anyway, no one in the ACLU will protest this because it follows their liberal agenda. And Ms. Green, the people who have been there and done that have a special perspective on things as opposed to someone who sits back in the comfortable world of the US.
Oh, and by the way, any film that depicts the murder of a president is an attack on ALL AMERICANS. Doesn't matter if you're right or left. Our president may not be perfect, but he's our president. As Americans, we have the right to disagree with him if we want. But we should unite against any foreigner who takes it upon him/herself to degrade the office of the president. That's one thing people don't get anymore. The power of the President lies with the office, not the man. You respect the office of the president even if you don't respect the man.
"Anyway, no one in the ACLU will protest this because it follows their liberal agenda."--russ5811
The ACLU has absolutely no jurisdiction in England. Why would you expect the ACLU or any other American to have anything to say in whether or not the film is produced in a foreign country? Or shown in a foreign country? Do foreigners tell Americans what sort of films Americans can make and show in this country?
But you may want to ask yourself why our supposed greatest friend and ally, England, isn't making a huge stink over this.
Where's Bush's great, great pal Tony Blair? He's a very important Brit who should have something to say, not the AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION. Or don't you understand that?
But you find it easier to blame the American ACLU and liberals rather than the real villians who produced this: THE BRITS!
You manage to blame Americans first don't you, for something a foreign entity has done.
And Ms. Green, the people who have been there and done that have a special perspective on things as opposed to someone who sits back in the comfortable world of the US.--russ5811
I understand. That's why I listen to people like John Kerry, John Murtha, and Max Cleland when they criticize the president's war policies: they've been there and done that and have a special perspective, as you correctly point out to me.
Unlike, say, Ronald Reagan, who never was "there" or "done that." And before you get all angered up, remember YOU said only someone who's been there and done that can understand, so apparently, Ronald Reagan, who saw no combat duty but made movies back in the safe USofA, Hollywood, for the government during World War II, couldn't have the proper perspective. Right? You said it, not me.
This is proof there are alot of sadistic people in this world. I don't agree with George Bush's policies and the way he is running the country, but I don't wish death upon anyone.
I don't need to back up my common sense approach to things Mrs. Green. I do not have to cut and paste some mumbo jumbo that you found on someone else's blog or article in some obscure publication to make my point. You haven't made one single argument of your own as of yet and are dependent upon the words and arguments that others of your movement have come up with. This is called being a mind numb robot. People that do this can only follow and will never have the ability to make arguments or decisions without having to refer back to the "proper" authorities. This is a common problem of our society today. e.g. Government workers won't make common sense decisons but rather put it on the shoulders of higher ups so they can't be blamed if something goes wrong as was the case so many times over during the recovery from the Katrina disaster.They can not think for themselves and must rely on someone else to do it for them. Mrs. Green is a typical example of this malady, every argument is based upon the words and thoughts of others and that's why she must constantly refer to the words of others to back up her aruments.
The difference between the honorable colleagues I chose to associate myself with that have served in the military Mrs. Green is that we truly believe in what we do and are protecting our country for the good of all Americans but John Murtha is using his former service status to further his own political ambitions on the backs of the troops that are fighting and dying in the fields and roads of Afghanistan and Iraq. In our Marine and Navy community he has earned the distinction that few ever do "ex-Marine". Even those that have served and have once been considered heroes on the fields of battles must strive that much harder for the rest of their lives due to their fame to live up to those ideals that gave them the strength to be heroes in the first place. There is a laundry list of recent fallen heroes that prove my point. John Glenn left his US Senate seat rather than face charges of money laundering and selling his office to the highest bidder (that really, and truly hurt me deep down where my deepest feelings of faith in my fellow Americans is), Randy (Duke) Cunningham left his house seat and is now serving time for crimes of using his office for personal gain. The list goes on for those people but fortunately the other side of that is there are so many that don't succumb to that kind of betrayal.
No Mrs. Green, you have made a wrong assessment and false premise by accusing anyone of using the straw man approach to stating their side of an argument. The leaders of your movement can make quite a bit of a difference by coming out and openly condemning this film made by this British malcontent. They can tell their mind numb robots to not attend the opening of this film and openly boycotting advertisers if it shown on US television but you and your ilk will not do that because of your hate and loathing of George Bush. My bite is much worse than my bark Mrs. Green and you should feel fortunate that I do not spend my time refuting every one of your silly and non-sense arguments point by endless point that you come up with because I have a life and I don't have much spare time to waste. You do a fine enough job of making yourself look silly without much help from me.
Mrs Green,
Unlike, say, Ronald Reagan, who never was "there" or "done that." And before you get all angered up, remember YOU said only someone who's been there and done that can understand, so apparently, Ronald Reagan, who saw no combat duty but made movies back in the safe USofA, Hollywood, for the government during World War II, couldn't have the proper perspective. Right? You said it, not me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gee I suppose we could say the same about Clinton!
Dont bother going there Mrs Green.
Penn,
This is proof there are alot of sadistic people in this world. I don't agree with George Bush's policies and the way he is running the country, but I don't wish death upon anyone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I cant say I will shed one tear when Bin Laden gets nailed!
They know exactly where bin Laden is and they will not get him. It ios all about politics
I can tell you one thing that I do know Penn_Prog, if they knew exactly where Bin Laden was they would kill him and post a picture of his body on every satellite that could be positioned to broadcast such a thing.
In a few weeks you will see a movie that documents all the differnt ways Bid Laden has escaped his death over the years. Finding and killing a man of his resource is no easy task. He has the popular support of religious fanatics bent on the destruction of all Jews and Americans. This is a fight to the death for them.
Oh cripes. I have to keep coming back here to defend myself from jg, who is obviously misrepresenting everything I say.
Well here goes:
I don't need to back up my common sense approach to things Mrs. Green. I do not have to cut and paste some mumbo jumbo that you found on someone else's blog or article in some obscure publication to make my point.--jg
Please show me exactly where on this post I've done that. You can't because I haven't. So you're wrong again.
You haven't made one single argument of your own as of yet and are dependent upon the words and arguments that others of your movement have come up with.--jg
Oh gawd. You're wrong again and again. This is boring. Please give me evidence for this accusation. You can't. I've cut and pasted nothing from anywhere on the subject of the British film depicting a president's assassination. This is pathetic.
This is called being a mind numb robot. People that do this can only follow and will never have the ability to make arguments or decisions without having to refer back to the "proper" authorities. This is a common problem of our society today.--jg
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
The leaders of your movement can make quite a bit of a difference by coming out and openly condemning this film made by this British malcontent. They can tell their mind numb robots to not attend the opening of this film and openly boycotting advertisers if it shown on US television but you and your ilk will not do that because of your hate and loathing of George Bush.--jg
The liberals did not make this film. George Bush's pals--the Brits made this film. Why should the liberals in this country have to prove anything. Why don't you Repubs come out and condemn the film, afterall, it is George Bush's ally, Tony Blair, and his country that made this film. Not the ACLU, not John Kerry, not Michael Moore. A BRITISH COMPANY MADE THIS FILM.
Get over your frothing anger and place the blame where it is due. ON THE BRITS.
I don't hate George Bush. That would mean that I had a strong emotion for him. I don't. I'm just waiting for his time in office to pass into oblivion.
Hate him? Uh-uh. I'm just enjoying watching him and what he stands for lose its hold on the American people.
It's happening even as you rant and demonize the left.
There is no defense that would suffice Mrs. Green. It is useless for you to try because I'm demonstrating to you exactly what is being done to George Bush. Nothing you say is ever going mean a thing or have any validity and you have just proved exactly my point about how the Bush haters will never be to listen to reason because their blinding hate will never let them be able to see. It's frustrating isn't it?
When we capture bin Laden I will believe otherwise. The Bush family and the bin Laden family were partners in business for many years. That is the politics behind it. J_G you live in an area where you have had to seen a Hess Express. I know I have and we only live about 40 miles from each other. There is one down the road from my house. The bin Laden family owns a percentage(not sure of the exact amount) of the Hess Express congolmerate.
Anybody can make a daring and original film about assassinating George W. Bush.
Let's see them make a film about how women are treated in Muslim countries, or blowing up the Ka'aba, if they want to impress us with being fearless and socially relevant.
Oh, wait. Theo VanGogh tried that, and the Muslims killed him. Never mind.
Mrs. Green. You state that you "categorically and unconditionally condemn" this vile film.
One sentence later you are launching another transparent attempt at moral equivalence by bringing up some old news about Jerry Falwell.
That sounds like you are categorizing and conditioning to me.
Sorry, but if you really felt that you needed to condemn this film you would not have spent MOST of your comment condemning something completely different.
And please allow me to drive a nail in that moral equvivalence nonsense.
Did you see Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson sitting in the Presidential Box at the GOP convention in 2004?
Nope... we Republicans don't elevate our more extreme elements.
However... No doubt you did see another dubious filmmaker, Michael Moore sitting right up there next to Jimmy Carter.
Making the one sentence condemnation you did then launching a screed about conservatives like Falwell strikes me as being rather childish.
"...we Republicans don't elevate our more extreme elements."--mike's america
Sanctimonious pap.
Big Dick cheney goes on the drug addict, Limbaugh's, radio show all the time and the White House has spoken out in support of him.
The Republicans had the embezzler and discredited Iraqi, Ahmed Chalabi, sitting next to Laura Bush at Bush's 2004 State of the Union address.
And the Coulter is still a darling among the conservatives. Remember her? The extremist who said the 911 widows enjoyed their husbands' deaths--the one who said Bill Clinton should be assassinated?
And Karl Rove hasn't encouraged Bush play his policies to the people who support Falwell and Robertson? Ha! That's Bush's conservative Christian base. And no amount of dissembling can refute it.
Falwell=Christian conservatives=Bush Base.
Mrs Green is a troll. If she truly believed what she is saying she would do it on her own time and place.
There's nothing wrong with debating the issues but it's the same thing as dealing with al queda, they have no actual country to attack so you have to pick your battlefield to annihilate them such as Iraq.
If you are a responsible debater you must have something to lose if you become too beligerent. I'll use the example of France. They may disagree with US policies but they are not going to launch attacks because they have something to lose. France also aggrees with the US from time to time. Something the liberals never do anymore because they have become arrogant and condecending.
Stop being an unreasonable troll Mrs. Green you're exactly what the problem is.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is that the thinking comes from the people with conservatives. With liberals, you are told what to think. Jerry Falwell's words are just that, Jerry Fallwell's words. Nancy Pelosi's words are the words you use Mrs. Green.
Picture this, millions of liberals at the democrat convention picking their next chioce for president which will be Hillary Clinton but you disagree with the liberal stance on abortion. You are Governor of a swing state though. The democrats put you up in the back behind a post and will not let you speak at the convention. Gosh , that sounds like a fairy tale doesn't Mrs. Green? It's not, it happened to the Father of the candidate for the US Seanate seat here in my state of Pennsylavania. That's very inclusive and diversified eh Mrs. Green?
You have to give up the blinders and really take look at what's going on Mrs. Green. You don't sound like a bad person, just a very confused one that has been listening to wrong people.
Mrs Green said...Dick cheney goes on the drug addict, Limbaugh's, radio show all the time and the White House has spoken out in support of him.
The differencee between drug addiction and the thinking of liberals such as Michael Moore,George Soros, and Hillary Clinton is that to become an acceptable and responsible memeber of society your behavior must be recognized and admitted to in order for a change to occur. So far I have seen no movement in those I have mentioned to recognize their malady so the problem will contiune unabated.
The differencee between drug addiction and the thinking of liberals such as Michael Moore,George Soros, and Hillary Clinton is that to become an acceptable and responsible memeber of society your behavior must be recognized and admitted to in order for a change to occur. So far I have seen no movement in those I have mentioned to recognize their malady so the problem will contiune unabated.--jg
Limbaugh's behavior was based on the illegal use of drugs. The Democrats you've named above are engaged in perfectly legal and democratic behavior.
That you try to conflat the two only proves that you will go to any length to demonize the Democrats.
What Rush did was illegal. Being the opposition party and criticizing the party in power is not illegal.
Get it?
Sheesh.
You are correct Mrs Green, there are no laws that prevent the people that I have mentioned from sounding very stupid.
I do however have some concerns about George Soros as a money launderer that keeps his money in an offshore account so he pays no taxes.
I do however have some concerns about Michael Moore and his movies that tell outright lies for profit.
Hillary, well lets just say that her intentions on everything is questionable. As Little Richard says "Mercy!"
Uncle P,
Anybody can make a daring and original film about assassinating George W. Bush.
Let's see them make a film about how women are treated in Muslim countries, or blowing up the Ka'aba, if they want to impress us with being fearless and socially relevant.
Oh, wait. Theo VanGogh tried that, and the Muslims killed him. Never mind.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Great Post!
Mike,
Mrs. Green. You state that you "categorically and unconditionally condemn" this vile film.
One sentence later you are launching another transparent attempt at moral equivalence by bringing up some old news about Jerry Falwell.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Transparent Indeed!
Mrs Green,
Big Dick cheney goes on the drug addict, Limbaugh's, radio show all the time and the White House has spoken out in support of him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Careful we wouldnt want to confuse Rush Limbaugh with Patrick Kennedy!
Oh that's right Kennedy is an ELECTED drug addict!
JG,
If you are a responsible debater you must have something to lose if you become too beligerent. I'll use the example of France. They may disagree with US policies but they are not going to launch attacks because they have something to lose. France also aggrees with the US from time to time. Something the liberals never do anymore because they have become arrogant and condecending.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well you know JG, the strategy for the Dems now is a swift and immediate attack on the right, lol
Ha! Good Luck Liberals
It's a fucking MOVIE! get over it. Of course though you have no problem with a fictitious movie that slanders and smears Clinton over 911 right before the mid terms. Although 911 happened on Bush's watch and he ignored intelligence that warned of the attack and then failed miserably to thoroughly investigate it. Way to GOP keep clutchin at those straws till we take back the house.
Sweet Cheeks,
It's a fucking MOVIE! get over it. Of course though you have no problem with a fictitious movie that slanders and smears Clinton over 911 right before the mid terms. Although 911 happened on Bush's watch and he ignored intelligence that warned of the attack and then failed miserably to thoroughly investigate it. Way to GOP keep clutchin at those straws till we take back the house.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why must you always swear? It makes you look feeble and weak.
It's not a very ficticious movie about Clinton from where I sit, face it, 8 years vs. 8 months and us not getting attacked in 5 years speaks for itself.
Why didnt Clinton pay any attention to the warnings before he left office? Was it because he was to busy poking Monica?
I wouldnt hold my breath if I was you on taking the House or the Senate lol.
I didnt figure you would condemn this crud, I figure you would like for this to happen!
Post a Comment
<< Home