Does The New York Times Have A Direct Link To The Taliban?
One wonder's when one does'nt hear from Mullah Omar in 5 years how on earth the New York Times tracked him down! In Pakistan? Or even Reuter's or the AP and gave the story to the New York Times. Something is fishy here. For those of you that have forgotten who Mullah Omar is, he is the leader of the Taliban now scattered all over the region of Afghanistan/Pakistan/Waziristan area or somewhere along the Pakistan border, like I said scattered. Of course scattered since they no longer have any safe haven to commit thier atrocities or to give to Usama Bin Laden, Thank's to President Bush and the US lead coalition of Troops. The Taliban were the little group of idiot's that ran amuck willy nilly in Afghanistan, fought off the Russian's, and gave Usama Bin Laden safe haven and a place to plot and plan the 9-11 attacks.
What is strange about this article isnt that "Omar" is rambling on about the same old crap, we have to "Jihad Againt America" stuff that he used to ramble on about the last time any reporter met up with him, what is strange is the fact that ANY reporter has been talking to him AT ALL!! Especially knowing he is on our FBI's Most Wanted list! How did they contact him? Or did they contact him? Or was there a go-between? And who was it? I know the press doesnt have to reveal thier sources, but in a time of war? Why must the New York Times feel the need to aid the enemy?
As far as I know this is the only photo that has been taken of Mullah Muhammad Omar
Clip from the New York Times article:
PESHAWAR, Pakistan, Jan. 4 — In what appears to be the first exchange with a journalist since going into hiding five years ago, the Taliban leader, Mullah Muhammad Omar, said that he had not seen Al Qaeda’s chief, Osama bin Laden, in five years and that he would never negotiate with the United States-backed government of Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan. He also threatened to continue the war until foreign troops withdraw from Afghanistan. (Blah Blah Blah)
Full Article Here
Which brings me to my next concern.
If "Omar" hasnt seen him, where is he?
This is the last time we saw Usama Bin Laden, October 2004
Look's pretty rough doesnt he? Doesnt look like that happy ass smiling face we saw right after 9-11! He look's quite weathered and not in the best of health, well that could be from crawling around in caves and having to rely on a mule for official news and information as of the last known time anyone saw him. Not to mention he supposedly had a kidney problem and was on dialasis, and probably didnt have much access or hookup to his dialasis machine from a cave.
And the last known AudioTape from Bin Laden was in January 2006.
Yet we have been hearing alot out of this guy
...................................Zawahiri
Since Usama was in such poor condition, and he would have stuck out like a sore thumb being 7 ft tall, and probably beginning to be a pain in the ass to hide or drag around by mule, one also wonders looking at Zawahiri and what good condition he seems to be in and looking better every time we see him, if he is in better condition because he no longer has to drag around Usama? Which also makes one wonder was this Usama's Funeral?
A US Drone pick's up this image in July 2006 in Afghanistan and didnt fire on it knowing it was a
Funeral! But is there more to this funeral than meet's the eye? Was it Usama's? Is that the reason Omar hasnt seen Usama, and Zawahiri is looking pretty darn healthy? We havent seen Usama in over 2 years, the last audio which seemed to have some current events on it was a year ago, and then a photo of a pretty large sum of Taliban in Afghanistan at a funeral in July? I think Usama is dead! And unless the Afghani's or the NATO troops go dig it up, we may never know.
What puzzle's me is every time there is a Video tape, an Audio tape, and/or interview's with these freak's it isnt alway's Al-Jazeera who publishes this stuff, it's also Reuters, the AP, and most deffinately the New York Times!! Strange isnt it how the New York Times alway's seems to have the exclusive's these days?
UPDATE: ZAWAHIRI SENDS NEW MESSAGE:
Gee isnt this a shock, ironic to be talking about this and we get a new message:
A jihadist website is observed on 5 January to post several links to 5-minute and 30-second audio message by Al-Qa'ida's second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahiri entitled "Rise up and Support Your Brothers in Somalia."
Following is the text of the audio message, dated Dhu al-Hijjah 1427 hegira, corresponding to January 2007, produced by Al-Sahahb Media Productions:
"In the name of God, praise be to God, and prayers and peace be upon God's Prophet, his household, companions, and supporters. My Muslim brothers everywhere, God's peace and blessings be upon you.
While I am addressing you today, the Crusader invading Ethiopian forces are violating the Islamic land of dear Somalia. Moreover, the Security Council is plotting to approve this invasion by issuing its resolution to dispatch international forces to Somalia and by its failure to issue a resolution that calls for the withdrawal of the Ethiopian forces from Somalia. Here, I am urging the Islamic nation in Somalia to be steadfast in this new Crusader battlefield, which America, its allies, and the United Nations are waging against Islam and Muslims.
(Blah Blah Blah)
Read Full Zawahiri Dribble Here
This guy is releasing to many tapes. He isnt dragging Usama with him anymore
What is strange about this article isnt that "Omar" is rambling on about the same old crap, we have to "Jihad Againt America" stuff that he used to ramble on about the last time any reporter met up with him, what is strange is the fact that ANY reporter has been talking to him AT ALL!! Especially knowing he is on our FBI's Most Wanted list! How did they contact him? Or did they contact him? Or was there a go-between? And who was it? I know the press doesnt have to reveal thier sources, but in a time of war? Why must the New York Times feel the need to aid the enemy?
As far as I know this is the only photo that has been taken of Mullah Muhammad Omar
Clip from the New York Times article:
PESHAWAR, Pakistan, Jan. 4 — In what appears to be the first exchange with a journalist since going into hiding five years ago, the Taliban leader, Mullah Muhammad Omar, said that he had not seen Al Qaeda’s chief, Osama bin Laden, in five years and that he would never negotiate with the United States-backed government of Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan. He also threatened to continue the war until foreign troops withdraw from Afghanistan. (Blah Blah Blah)
Full Article Here
Which brings me to my next concern.
If "Omar" hasnt seen him, where is he?
This is the last time we saw Usama Bin Laden, October 2004
Look's pretty rough doesnt he? Doesnt look like that happy ass smiling face we saw right after 9-11! He look's quite weathered and not in the best of health, well that could be from crawling around in caves and having to rely on a mule for official news and information as of the last known time anyone saw him. Not to mention he supposedly had a kidney problem and was on dialasis, and probably didnt have much access or hookup to his dialasis machine from a cave.
And the last known AudioTape from Bin Laden was in January 2006.
Yet we have been hearing alot out of this guy
...................................Zawahiri
Since Usama was in such poor condition, and he would have stuck out like a sore thumb being 7 ft tall, and probably beginning to be a pain in the ass to hide or drag around by mule, one also wonders looking at Zawahiri and what good condition he seems to be in and looking better every time we see him, if he is in better condition because he no longer has to drag around Usama? Which also makes one wonder was this Usama's Funeral?
A US Drone pick's up this image in July 2006 in Afghanistan and didnt fire on it knowing it was a
Funeral! But is there more to this funeral than meet's the eye? Was it Usama's? Is that the reason Omar hasnt seen Usama, and Zawahiri is looking pretty darn healthy? We havent seen Usama in over 2 years, the last audio which seemed to have some current events on it was a year ago, and then a photo of a pretty large sum of Taliban in Afghanistan at a funeral in July? I think Usama is dead! And unless the Afghani's or the NATO troops go dig it up, we may never know.
What puzzle's me is every time there is a Video tape, an Audio tape, and/or interview's with these freak's it isnt alway's Al-Jazeera who publishes this stuff, it's also Reuters, the AP, and most deffinately the New York Times!! Strange isnt it how the New York Times alway's seems to have the exclusive's these days?
UPDATE: ZAWAHIRI SENDS NEW MESSAGE:
Gee isnt this a shock, ironic to be talking about this and we get a new message:
A jihadist website is observed on 5 January to post several links to 5-minute and 30-second audio message by Al-Qa'ida's second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahiri entitled "Rise up and Support Your Brothers in Somalia."
Following is the text of the audio message, dated Dhu al-Hijjah 1427 hegira, corresponding to January 2007, produced by Al-Sahahb Media Productions:
"In the name of God, praise be to God, and prayers and peace be upon God's Prophet, his household, companions, and supporters. My Muslim brothers everywhere, God's peace and blessings be upon you.
While I am addressing you today, the Crusader invading Ethiopian forces are violating the Islamic land of dear Somalia. Moreover, the Security Council is plotting to approve this invasion by issuing its resolution to dispatch international forces to Somalia and by its failure to issue a resolution that calls for the withdrawal of the Ethiopian forces from Somalia. Here, I am urging the Islamic nation in Somalia to be steadfast in this new Crusader battlefield, which America, its allies, and the United Nations are waging against Islam and Muslims.
(Blah Blah Blah)
Read Full Zawahiri Dribble Here
This guy is releasing to many tapes. He isnt dragging Usama with him anymore
posted by Marie's Two Cents | 10:01 PM
8 Comments:
It should be of no surprise that the NY Times has exclusive stories about the goings on of Al Queda and the Taliban. The NY Times has been in the business of publishing anti American and especially anti Bush stories for many years. If there is a story that can be made to make George Bush look bad then it gets an above the fold space automatically.
Sure,guys like the Mullah Omar and al Zwahiri are under the gun but the NY Times isn't going give up these sources. Hell, the circulation has gone down so much they will print anything now if they think it will sell papers.
Bin Laden, I'd say there is more than a 50% chance that he is dead but never underestimate the cleverness and resources of your enemy. No doubt Bin Laden's capabilitiy to launch another major attack has been seriously reduced but if he is thought to be dead and he isn't then he has the advantage of surprise. You can never let your guard down with an enemy as determined as these men have proven to be.
Marie, I agree with J_G but also I not only think that the New York Times have a direct link to the Taliban but so does the National Democrat Party.
Just look how many of the Dems went to England to meet with some Hamas leaders behind the Administrations back.
Remember Gayle the liberal MSM has no conscience when it comes to interviews. Don't forget Dan Rather and Saddam on the eve of war, Mike Wallace and Achmadinijad of Iran, and that CNN, (forgot his name) who interviewed Saddam DURING the first Gulf War. So this NYT crap is nothing unusual. That is part of the MSM problem they forget that they are Americans and not JUST reporters. The Press in WWII were Americans first and the reporting expressed that. As far as Bin Laden I agree he is either dead or almost dead and not able to do anything except swallow oatmeal. Only wish we could have seen him drop like Saddam after months of payback torture with every American having a shot at him.
JG,
As much as the New york times have been committing treason, you would think in a time of war, when all our lives are at stake, that this would be the one time they should have thier press credentials jerked! Shut them down if all they are going to do is help the enemy. And have THEM investigated!
I undestand we have to assume Bin Hidin is still alive until proven otherwise, but I wish they would go dig up that grave! Then again if they do, and he is, and we let the world know about it, there could be a swarm of terrorism the likes we might not even be able to deal with.
Then again if they have, and anyone knows about it, I'm sure at the most inappropriate and most reckless of times to reveal this information along will come the New York Times!
Night,
Marie, I agree with J_G but also I not only think that the New York Times have a direct link to the Taliban but so does the National Democrat Party.
Just look how many of the Dems went to England to meet with some Hamas leaders behind the Administrations back.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
I wouldnt doubt if the Dems have a direct connection either, it seems they march along to the same drumbeat as the NYT.
Ken,
I know this NYT crap is nothing unusual, but it sure is getting annoying. Where has the dignity gone? Why arent they acting like American's first, and reporters second? Why do they insist on helping the enemy and assisting in putting those in positions of power that will help the enemy even more?
It's just making me sick.
Good post, Marie. I always wondered how ABC News could interview Bin Laden in 1998 yet the US Govt couldn't find and kill him then.
Thank's AC,
It is very disturbing that these people in a time of war, do absolutely any and everything to get an interview, but do absolutely nothing to get these freak's captured. I would assume being a major newspaper, especially in New York, they would give at least a hint, not necissarily devulge thier sources, but just a little hint where the US Government could run across these fools!
Post a Comment
<< Home