Democrats' Civil War: Clinton's vs. Kennedy

Democrats' Civil War: Clintons vs. Kennedy

The apparent selection of Howard Dean as chairman of the Democratic Party indicates the party does not want to learn from its ways. That's good news for Republicans.

The Dean ascension also indicates that when it comes to grassroots Democrats, it's the liberalism of Dean, Kerry and Ted Kennedy that still holds sway among party cadres.

For some time, NewsMax has reported that Hillary Clinton has long had her guns set on Dean. During the bitter primary campaign last year, we noted that a source close to Dean's mother blamed Hillary and Bill for all of her son's campaign woes.

Now it is no longer an open secret that Hillary dislikes Dean.

But it is clear that a larger civil war has long been under way in the Democratic Party that ironically has pitted Hillary and Bill as the "moderates" against Dean and his faction -- which is still controlled by the Kennedy-Kerry circle.

Kennedy's recent bellicose speech to the National Press Club spit in the face of moderation and said the party should stick to its core positions: pacifism, higher taxes, more abortion rights, more gay rights, etc.

The reasoning for this positioning is that the Kennedy faction does not believe the Democrats have lost elections because of their liberal views.

They believe that the 2004 election was lost solely on national security and the "war on terror."

An associate of Kennedy recently told NewsMax the view is simple: "Stand firm, and the Iraq war will turn into such a disaster, the Democrats will win big in 2006." The source added, "The Democrats won't have to do a thing but remain opposed to the war."

The war and growing body count will feed angst, the source said, among the right wing, who will soon demand an end to the war.

Perhaps so. But the recent relatively calm elections in Iraq suggest the insurgency may be abating rather than increasing.
----------------------------------------------------------------
So basicaly the Liberals NEED things to go bad in Iraq for thier own agenda.
Why am I not shocked. They dont care about American Soldiers Lives, they are not as "Dean" would have you believe "Strong On Defense". They simply will do what ever it takes to win back the White House.
They will wrap themselves in the Flag, start going to church, and pretending they are still the party of minorities, even when you have proof posative the Republicans are and always have been the party of Minorities.
Like Dean said the other day "The only way Republicans could get Minorities into the same room is if they invited the staff" Speaking at the Congressional Caucus the other day. What the hell was that suppose to mean? Only staff memebers are minorities? What if the "Staff" working at the Congressional Caucus was all White?
Oh well Howard Dean is going to stuff his big fat foot in his big fat mouth over the next four years so I guess that kind of talk is to be expected.
Just remember who has "Minorities" in thier administration unpresidented than any other administration. President Bush
And the REPUBLICAN that made this all possible for the Minorities, a Republican named Abraham Lincoln!!